Jordens fremtid er blitt vårt felles ansvar

Økt drivhuseffekt varmer opp Jorden, isbreer smelter og været går amok. Sur nedbør dreper skogene. Ozonlaget spises opp av kjemikalier og etterlater oss uten beskyttelse mot de farlige ultrafiolette strålene fra Solen. Dommedagsprofetiene kjenner vi godt, men de siste 20 årene viser at vi faktisk kan gjøre en hel del med problemene.

Bakgrunnsmateriale
I listen nedenfor finner du mer kildestoff til artikkelen ovenfor.

Listen er ment som en service for lesere som ønsker å gå dypere inn i det aktuelle temaet på egen hånd. 
Vi har ikke muligheter til å bidra med ytterligere informasjon, og av prinsipielle grunner kan vi ikke oppgi telefonnummer eller adresse til skribenten eller forskere som er blitt intervjuet. 

Books:
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: ”The conditions of forests in Europe, 2003 excecutive report”.

UNEP: ”Global Environment Outlook-3”.
IPCC: ”Climate Change 2001, Synthesis report, Summary for policymakers”

Websites:
http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/ozone/ozone.html
http://www.atm.ch.cam.ac.uk/tour/, http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/info/ozone_anim.html
http://www.epa.gov/docs/ozone/science/sc_fact.htmlhttp://www.science.org.au/nova/004/004key.htm
http://www.dmi.dk/f+u/
http://www.climatehotmap.org/

Magazines:
”China chokes”, New Scientist 29.11.97.
”Acian states takes first step on acid rain”, Nature 2.4.98.
”End of acid reign?”, Nature 7.10.99.
”Long-term data show lingering effects from acid rain”, Science 13.4.01.
”Fertilized to death”, Nature 30.10.03.
”The Antarctic ozone hole”, Scientific American januar 1988.
”Burnt by the sun down under”, Science 10.9.99.
”You don’t have to burn to get too much sun”, New Scientist 11.12.99.
”The effect of climate change on ozone depletion through changes in stratospheric water vapour”, Nature 25.11.99.
”The hole story”, New Scientist 19.2.00.
”Global warming could be bad for Arctic ozone layer”, Nature 6.400.
”Quantifying denitrification and its effect on ozone recovery”, Science 26.5.00.
”An unbearable beating by light?”, Nature 6.6.00.
”Back from the brink” New Scientist 8.9.01.
”A brigther outlook for good ozone”, Science 6.9.02.
”UV-B-stråling hæmmer plankton”, Polarfronten 1/03.
”Light sunburn” Science 13.6.03.
”The first signs of a recovery”, Science 15.8.03.
”Ozone and climate change”, Science 10.10.03.
”Ozone hopes holed”, New Scientist 11.10.03.

”Sulphate aerosol and climate change”, Scientific American februar 94.
”As the world warms, the heavens open”, New Scientist 4.4.98.
”Absorbing phenomena”, Science 12.5.00.
”How pollution suppresses rain”, Science 10.3.00.
”Anthropogenic warming of Earths climate system”, Science 13.4.01.
”Touble in the greenhouse”, Nature 7.9.00.
”The dark side of aerosols”, Nature 8.2.01.
”Rising global temperature, rising uncertenty”, Science 13.4.01.
”Reshaping the theory on cloud formation”, Science 15.6.01.
”Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle”, Science 7.12.01.
”How the rich stole the rain”, 15.6.02.
”How Alaska affects the world”, Science 19.7.02.
”Pollution is plunging us into darkness”, New Scientist 14.12.02.
”A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system”, Nature 12.9.02.
”Climate forcing by aerosols – a hazy picture”, Science 16.5.03.
”Heat will soar as haze fades”, New Scientist 7.6.03.
”Alpine thaw breaks ice over permafrost´s role”, Nature 14.8.03.
”Too hot to handle”, Nature 25.9.03.
”Last chance for Kyoto”, New Scientist 25.10.03.
”Meltdown”, New Scientist, 2.11.03.